The-Resume Home
  ESPs | ARTICLES | SEARCH | CART | ADD LINK | LOGIN
   HOME > ARTICLES > Promotion > Search for Relevance in Ranking


Prev

Search for Relevance in Ranking

Next

Search engines used to rely on webmasters to provide an honest assessment of web site content by simply accepting exactly what was placed in the meta tags of each site.




The engines ranked the sites in the beginning by looking almost entirely at those tags and serving results based on whether search words and phrases were contained in the meta tags. That was when everyone publishing web pages was sweet, naive and honest as twelve-year-old boyscouts.

Ranking algorithms began getting immensely more complex as webmasters started manipulating search results either by lying about the content of the site in those meta tags, or by stuffing those tags with keyword phrases. Meanwhile, search engines started looking for formulas that could deliver reliable and relevant results without relying on honesty in meta tags.

Google rose to prominence in a very short time by placing far less emphasis on meta tags and far more emphasis on popularity, based on inbound links from other web sites.

I recently wrote an article entitled, "Reciprocal Linking is Dead!" after discovering a dishonest manipulation of that technique to increase affiliate sales through URL cloaking and redirected link schemes.

http://searchengineoptimism.com/reciprocal-linking-dead.html

Google's PageRank algorithm, combined with the speed of results pages, made them hugely popular with searchers, who seemed to find those results pages more relevant to their searches. Google continues adjusting algorithms to include site themes, interior linking structure, body text keyword density, frequency of updates, etc.

Search over the past five years had experienced dramatic expansion of players in the late nineties internet boom, followed by implosions of mergers, death & destruction. A brief and humorous article offers a recap of search engine births, marriages and affairs over this period.

http://searchengineoptimism.com/Yahoo_acquire_Overture.html

Recently, while search providers consolidated to fewer than a dozen major players from the hundreds of search engines of just a few years ago, optimistic new players have emerged seeking a piece of the search pie. Newest on the block is optimistically open source Nutch.com, which promises to openly publish their search algorithms while others continue to hide their proprietary formulae for relevant search results.

Meanwhile there are ongoing attempts by some engines to improve algorithms to reduce webmaster manipulation, increase relevancy and produce ever better results.




This week, the small, but very aggressive search engine http://www.ExactSeek.com announced a partnership with Alexa.com to adjust their ranking relevance using the popularity index of Alexa site rank. This move will, no doubt, anger many smaller webmasters whose Alexa rankings are lower than larger competitors. Smaller localized businesses that compete against national chain retailers will likely slip off the radar under this scheme. Substantial, quality content tips the scales back in favor of smaller content sites here.

But is this different than the popularity index scheme that Google uses determined by inbound links? Will those web sites in the results at ExactSeek with thousands of hard-won links disappear from the results pages when the Alexa factor is applied to ExactSeek algorithm?

I did a brief and unscientific test across the biggest search engines by searching for my own site at each one. One search phrase I've targeted is "Small business Internet Tutorial" and the results are enlightening.

MSN search returns my site, WebSite101.com as #1 result. Google, I'm proud to say, returns exactly the same #1. AlltheWeb.com gives WebSite101 position #6, still good. Teoma.com returns a results page with WebSite101 at #1.

The big boys of search comparing this well established and fairly popular site - all seem to produce similar results, all using differing algorithms to reach that conclusion.



It is of course not full article. You should login first to show full article. If you have not account, please register. It is FREE!!!


----- Mike Banks Valentine is a Search Engine Optimization Specialist practicing ethical SEO for Online businesses http://SEOptimism.com Take our Search Engine Quiz to test your Skills Level http://SearchEngineOptimism.com/search_engine_quiz.html
Become our columnist




Need a Date?
Try our online dearest site


Hire High Experienced PHP MySql Programmer

FIND JOB RESOURCES
  Enter your Keywords:
     
 
LATEST PROJECTS

 
Freelance Projects
Looking for
Freelance Work?

Click a category to see!
It's FREE to look!
Logo Design
Web Design
Complete Website
Web Programming
Flash Animation
Graphics
Banner Ads
Brochures
Illustration
Business Cards
Print Ads
More Categories
Bidding Information
Subscribe Today!

Ask manager online

   Home | Resumes | Articles | Search Resource | Related Links | Subscribe News | Terms | Top